Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Navy"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2019, 9:34 am
United States, which asked whether an employee of the Navy who died due to a complication could sue the federal government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:01 am
We expect better from an attorney representing the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 11:01 am
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878)). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
The Court first pointed to Department of the Navy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
United States - 4/28/14. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
FISHER At all relevant times, Meredith was a member of the United States Navy stationed at Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar (Miramar). [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 4:45 am
Judge Smith cites a prior ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Behold United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:03 am
Smith What bureaucrat can we blame for this? [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Department of the Navy. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
United States, United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
” And it looks like the Department may be pursuing that route. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:23 am
” Third, the court relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
